Harrisonburg police rescued a possible abduction victim one day last month after shooting the apparent perpetrator. A city press release said a domestic dispute on Old Furnace Road around 6:30 p.m. turned into an abduction. Police pursued the suspect’s vehicle to downtown, where they shot the suspect, who was apparently armed. The suspect was flown to U.Va. hospital and the victim was safe.
At least that’s what I got out of a DNR story that included the line, “The pursuit ended in front of the Rockingham County Sheriff's Office following an officer-involved shooting that ultimately injured the suspect.”
Journalism is dead. Or, in the same jargon as the press release, “Journalism ended following a Craigslist-involved financial loss that ultimately ate the newspapers’ lunch.”
Picking on the DNR may be unfair, since WHSV ran the same headline on the same press release. But picking on either of them leaves out that they’re part of a general problem with journalism. That problem is two-fold. First is the lack of money in journalism. Second is the fealty to obsolete journalistic models.
Craigslist is not the only cause of decline in newspaper revenue, but the loss of classified ad revenue is the largest hit. A third or more of a paper’s advertising product is being given away by a medium with far greater reach than the paper’s.
The journalistic model is still based in part on the idea that news outlets compete. They don’t and they didn’t, but news people loved the model. When Ben Bradlee retired as executive editor of the Post 30 years ago, the DNR didn’t put the story on page one because the managing editor said the Post was our competition. It wasn’t. But the fallacy holds.
Middle-aged boys in newsrooms acted as if they were competing with other news outlets long after radio, tv, and newspapers had dwindled to one source per city for most of the country. My high point in news competition came when police asked me, as DNR city editor, and Bob Corso, as WHSV news director, to hold a story about a drug bust for a few days. The HPD lieutenant was covering all his bases, but to me the distinguishing feature of the story was that WHSV had it and we didn’t. I did the only thing I could. With the tone of a man giving away a thing of great value for the good of the community, I told Corso, “We’ll hold off if you will.”
Yesterday’s shooting stories had multiple outlets but only one source. The source was the city’s communications director. It would be fair to call him a publicist, and perhaps a little mean to call him a flack or a shill. But it’s fair and accurate to say that a person in that position for any large organization is not being paid to give the whole story about anything or to give it well. His job is to provide information that makes the city look good and to answer reporters’ inquiries without letting anybody know the press releases were written by human beings.
That there were not a half-dozen reporters on the scene is not a failing of the reporters or their employers. It’s an acknowledgement that the reporters don’t exist. There are currently fewer full-time equivalent reporters working for all news outlets in the city and county combined than there were just at the DNR 30 years ago. Or as Jimmy Buffet put it in another context, “My occupational hazard being my occupation's just not around.”
Gone are the days when budding journalists got their start at small local newspapers where they covered everything from story time at the library to murder trials. Along the way, they learned about the importance of accurate reporting and were mentored by seasoned editors.
Many of those papers are either history or have been replaced by cut and paste montages of press releases and letters to the editor kept afloat by publishing government notices. There is little or no informed coverage of local government, which has a great impact on daily lives. “News” seemed to have been replaced by inflammatory sound bites.